- published: 14 Jan 2015
- views: 1819
https://sensibleinvesting.tv In this video blog, Weston Wellington from Dimensional Fund Advisors explains how study after study has shown there are no asset classes in which an active fund manager's skill can add significant value. The main problem, he says, is there are simply far too many active managers competing with one another. Transcript: Hello again. If you’re a regular viewer of Sensible Investing, you’ll know we don’t recommend using actively managed funds. Some say we overstate our case, that we somehow have it in for active managers. In fact neither of those is true. In a recent interview he gave us, Weston Wellington from Dimensional Fund Advisors explained how there’s no contradiction in having the utmost respect for active managers, while at the same time advising c...
► Subscribe to the Financial Times on YouTube: http://bit.ly/FTimeSubs UK asset managers are not being active enough, missing out on opportunities by passively tracking market indices, but still charging high fees. Gina Miller, founding partner of SCM Private, tells John Authers about the pitfalls of closet indexing For more video content from the Financial Times, visit http://www.FT.com/video Subscribe to the Financial Times on YouTube; http://goo.gl/vUQx5k Twitter https://twitter.com/ftvideo Facebook https://www.facebook.com/financialtimes
Disruption as a business trend has significantly affected the asset-management industry, says Gunnar Miller, and AllianzGI as an active manager has found ways to adapt. Topping the list is the implementation of new disruption ratings on the companies we cover, which helps us better identify potential risks for the benefit of our clients.
► Subscribe to the Financial Times on YouTube: http://bit.ly/FTimeSubs Active fund managers, who attempt to beat the market, suffered their worst performance in decades during 2014, while money flowed out to rival passive funds, which merely track market indexes. John Authers reports from New York on the trouble for active fund managers, and their plans to fight back. The latest global markets overview http://www.ft.com/markets Click here for more FT Markets videos http://video.ft.com/Ft-Markets For more video content from the Financial Times, visit http://www.FT.com/video Subscribe to the Financial Times on YouTube; http://goo.gl/vUQx5k Twitter https://twitter.com/ftvideo Facebook https://www.facebook.com/financialtimes
(www.abndigital.com) So which is best: Pay an active manager and get the best of their fundamental views over time or try and approximate the markets return by going passive. The answer to this maybe has less to do with the actual style of asset management.
Join the Elite Investor Club here - http://www.eliteinvestorclub.com/ http://www.grahamrowan.com/ - Visit my website for more Tips & Advice Subscribe to my channel for weekly videos. As passive funds start to out-perform the majority of their active peers, the managers who think they make a genuine difference are starting to fight back! When I interviewed Hargreaves Lansdown’s head of research Mark Dampier recently, he candidly admitted that ninety per cent of actively managed funds are rubbish. Perhaps the best indicator of all is Hargreaves Lansdowns Wealth One Fifty, the best funds chosen from the three thousand or so available to UK investors. As of today, they can only find ninety six funds to put in the Wealth one fifty. But he also made an important point. He said that passive...
In the investment industry, few debates are waged more intensely than that between "active" and passive" investing. As investors read media coverage about the futility of trying to pick stocks and the advantages of investing via ETF's instead, more and more are questioning the fees they're paying for investment advice. - See more at: http://www.clientinsights.ca/en/article/proof-active-managers-can-outperform#sthash.VnpmvGPs.dpuf
Is active management worth it? Is it worth paying a fund manager? Chris Bailey - an Economist and Ex-fund manager comments. In participating in this area and finding a star/alpha producing manager with a track record difficult? PLEASE LIKE AND SHARE SO WE CAN BRING YOU MORE! What is a fair fee? How much do investors lose in charges and management fees? How do you go about choosing a financial advisor? I think that many funds that are supposed to be active have stuck too close to the passive style of management and these are not justifying their fees at all. So make sure your fund manager is really active. But I believe proper active fund managers can be found; people who are who are savvy and intelligent and have exhibited positive performance over an extended period of time.
Speaking at Fund Forum Berlin 2016, Investec MD Richard Garland paints an ominous picture of inexorably rising passive solutions, and pinpoints the way for active managers to survive For more live coverage go to www.fundforumlive.com. Follow the conversation on Twitter via #FundForum
This video is about if can active managers outperform the market
Over the past several years, investor sentiment has shifted from active stock picking to passive indexing. Should you do the same for your portfolio? The answer is more complicated than you might think. Both active and passive investing are subject to cyclical performance. And to make things more confusing, some “active” managers stick so closely to their benchmark indices that they can be considered effectively passive. Truly active management, however, has shown itself to be more resilient in a down market. Now that equities are in the sixth year of a bull market with a correction looming, is now the time for active managers to shine? This webinar discusses how you can take advantage of active management to help boost your portfolio’s returns. Ziegler Capital Management’s Christian Grein...